Now I know why Julius Malema says all those quotable things he says. More importantly, I now know how he feels when he sees something he said a only a few hours prior appear in print. But I suspect having newspapers
present something I said a while ago as fresh utterances is something I'll have to confine to my
imagination.
My 15 minutes came about as a result of a Guardian journalist's quest to
jealously attack reprimand the online version of The Daily Mail for their obsession with female bodies. I'm not averse to a well-proportioned, shapely female body as you can
glean from this post but I draw the line at 14 year olds being said to be "
showing off their woman curves" and
so does she. I couldn't get through the rest but having read The Guardian before I think I can sum it up thus: Looking at a woman is predatory bla bla bla. Being attracted to a woman for anything other than her personality and intellect is sexist bla bla bla. The editor of the Daily Mail is a chauvinist bla bla bla. Everyone on the right is a raving homophobe and a misogynist bla bla bla. Then again I may be wrong.
See, I like hippies me. Who would say no to all that free love? Or have I woken up in a wrong decade. That said, thanks for the hits hippies, careful not to choke on that muesli. I'm off to bask on my new found fame.
No comments:
Post a Comment